| 作者 |
 万恶的是制度 不是broker |
 |
| 所跟贴 |
顶！有人看过国会最近的Financial Reform Draft吗？ -- 董洁林 - (130 Byte) 2010-5-13 周四, 01:47 (667 reads) |
emperorfan
[博客]
年龄: 51
加入时间: 2010/02/05
文章: 2008
海归分: 814623
|
|
|
作者：emperorfan 在 海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
https://files.haiguinet.com/newupload/1273702612_235FinancialReformSummary.pdf
https://banking.senate.gov/public/_files/FinancialReformSummaryAsFiled.pdf
我也希望REGULATOR 得个教训
但危机过后，都华丽地转身了
What did GM change after they emerge from bankruptcy.
60% opposed bailing GM, they got bailed.
but I doubt GM learned a serious lesson.
Talking about GM, GMAC and Chrysler Financial rescue is a muddy deal as well. I suspect Cerberus benefit more than they deserve.
另外，fdic 昨发文关于危机时如何将deposit 的银行从 holding company 分解出来。
https://fdic.gov/news/news/financial/2010/fil10026.html
zt related news comments:
Last week, Congress decided it would not confront Too Big To Fail, the single gravest threat to our collective financial security. But there are still several key Wall Street reforms worth fighting for—reforms that must be enacted before the next crisis hits, with or without a big bank break-up. And fortunately, key Senators have introduced amendments dealing with each one.
Blanche Lincoln’s Derivatives Bill
The most important fight from here on out is protecting the surviving elements of the derivatives bill crafted by Sen. Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark. The key reform in Lincoln’s bill would force big banks who deal derivatives to spin off those operations into separate companies. Derivatives are a breeding ground for straightforward gambling. For every $1 in legitimate risk-hedging in the derivatives market, there is $78 in speculative betting. That speculation is being backed by taxpayer perks—FDIC-insured deposits and Federal Reserve loans—that are supposed to support safe and productive lending, not reckless gambling. Lincoln would ban all federal backstops for this insanity, making the derivatives market less profitable, and therefore smaller, in the process.
This element of Lincoln’s bill is already in the Senate legislation, but Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., is pushing an amendment to gut this plan. Don’t let him get away with it. A vote for Gregg’s amendment is a vote for more– and more expensive– bank bailouts.
The Volcker Rule
The Volcker Rule has a similar aim to Blanche Lincoln’s derivatives plan. Economically essential banks shouldn’t be speculating with taxpayer money. The Volcker Rule would ban banks who receive Federal Reserve loans from conducting risky securities trades for their own accounts. Gambling with taxpayer money doesn’t help the economy in any way, it just produces short-term profits for banks while subjecting our tax dollars to long-term bailout risk. Whether the trades take the form of securities or derivatives, if they’re speculative, they shouldn’t be connected to the commercial banking system.
Sens. Carl Levin, D-Mich., and Jeff Merkeley, D-Ore., have authored an amendment that would require regulators to implement the Volcker Rule banning proprietary securities trading at commercial banks.
Audit The Fed
The Federal Reserve is the chief bailout engine for the U.S. banking system, and it operates under conditions of almost complete secrecy. Since the crisis broke out, the central bank has pumped nearly $4.3 trillion into the nation’s banks, but the taxpayers on the hook for these loans know almost nothing about them. We don’t know who the Fed extended loans to, the terms of the loans, or what Fed officials signed off on them.
This is a disgrace to democracy. Nowhere else in American government can public officials spend public money without detailed disclosure. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., has authored a bill that would subject the central bank’s bailout operations to a thorough and public audit. A more comprehensive audit authored by Reps. Alan Grayson, D-Fla., and Ron Paul, R-Texas, passed the House late last year. Both are worth supporting. If the Sanders amendment cleared the Senate, the audit could be widened in a conference with the House. But any effort to hold the Fed accountable is better than none.
Protect Consumers
When President Barack Obama first put forward his Wall Street reform proposals in June 2009, the strongest provision was a plan to create an independent Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA), whose sole charge was cracking down on abusive bank lending. Our current crop of regulators totally failed to perform this job over the past decade, as millions of foreclosure victims can attest to. Today’s bank regulators are charged with ensuring both bank profitability (a type of regulation known as “safety and soundness”) and that consumers are treated fairly. In practice, that has meant regulators ignore bank rip-offs, provided they create short-term profits.
Unfortunately, Obama’s strong CFPA bill has been watered down over the course of nearly a year of negotiations. Instead of an independent agency, the current Senate bill would house the consumer regulator at the Federal Reserve, a regulator which had the authority to crack down on mortgage market abuses throughout the crisis, but failed to exercise it. What’s worse, the current Senate bill limits the scope of the new consumer regulator’s rule-writing authority, gives the existing, failed regulators veto power over those rules, and restricts the new regulator’s ability to enforce its rules.
There was no good economic reason for the Senate to make any of these changes—they were all simply concessions to deep-pocketed bank lobbyists, nothing more, nothing less. Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., has an excellent amendment that would restore Obama’s original CFPA language, and provide real protection for consumers.
Cap Leverage
Banks amplify their bets by borrowing loads of money, a phenomenon called leverage. As the crisis unfolded in 2008, some banks found themselves with $40 or even $60 in borrowed money for every $1 of their own cash. That meant big profits while markets were moving up, but epic losses when markets started falling. The Senate must impose a hard cap on leverage to complement the 12-to-1 cap included in the Wall Street reform bill that cleared the House last year. The Brown-Kaufman amendment would have limited bank borrowing to $16.67 for every $1 of their own money. Brown-Kaufman also would have broken up the six largest U.S. banks, and was rejected in the Senate last week. The Senate should vote on the leverage cap as a stand-alone amendment.
作者：emperorfan 在 海归商务 发贴, 来自【海归网】 http://www.haiguinet.com
上一次由emperorfan于2010-5-13 周四, 09:32修改，总共修改了3次
| 相关主题 |
| 中国男人的软弱与制度的恶（1）：慷慨激昂满嘴仁义道德却懦弱的中国男人
|
海归商务 |
2011-11-13 周日, 12:45 |
| [原创]主权债的恶性膨胀是制度性缺陷所致
|
海归商务 |
2011-8-09 周二, 14:48 |
| 百度小说侵权丑恶嘴脸无顾忌面对作家，其非法跋扈行为从何而来？再次考问中国政...
|
海归商务 |
2011-3-27 周日, 12:34 |
| 美国发狠了 将百度淘宝列入恶名市场名单(组图) BBC ZT
|
海归商务 |
2011-3-01 周二, 21:52 |
| [鞭鞑罪恶的婚姻制度之N] 你作为女人喜欢老狼不可耻,你作为有夫之妇喜欢老...
|
海归酒吧 |
2009-7-30 周四, 09:42 |
| [鞭鞑市场经济下的罪恶的现实婚姻制度之三] 谁还拿着中国护照, 上面有你的...
|
海归茶馆 |
2009-7-29 周三, 14:20 |
| [ [鞭鞑罪恶的婚姻制度之二]婚男冒充花样男,婚女声称怀春女,未婚女专好已...
|
海归茶馆 |
2009-7-29 周三, 10:49 |
| [鞭鞑罪恶的市场经济下的现实婚姻制度之一] 靠F2, H4, J2, K3...
|
海归茶馆 |
2009-7-29 周三, 10:27 |
| |
|
|
|
| 返回顶端 |
|
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
您不能在本论坛发表新主题, 不能回复主题, 不能编辑自己的文章, 不能删除自己的文章, 不能发表投票, 您 不可以 发表活动帖子在本论坛, 不能添加附件不能下载文件, |
|
|
